SharePlus Federal Bank 2010 Annual Incentive Plan for Executives and Managers 2010 AIP Design Overview

EX-10.1 10 dex101.htm EXHIBIT 10.1 Exhibit 10.1

Exhibit 10.1

SharePlus Federal Bank

2010 Annual Incentive Plan for

Executives and Managers


2010 AIP Design Overview

 

A.    Design Component    Description
   Team Objective Weighting    50% Weighting
   Departmental/Individual Objective Weighting    50% Weighting
B.    Team Objective (50%)    Pre-Tax Net Income
   Pre-Tax Net Income will determine total funding of bonus pool   
   Pool may be reduced if the bank experiences unacceptable levels of delinquencies, classified assets or CAMELS ratings.   
C.    Departmental/Individual Objective Weighting (50%)   
   Three (3) goals for each individual weighted at 75%, and five (5) core competencies weighted at 25%   
D.    Payout/Performance    100% Pre Tax AOP=100% payout*
   Range of Payout*    0-245%
   Range of Performance*    50%-300% of AOP Plan
   Minimum Level Income to Qualify for 2010 Bonus    Minimum of 50% of 2009 AOP
   Performance Kicker    TBD at year end
   *(See 2010 Funding Model on following page)   

 

June 16, 2010    Confidential    2


2010

AIP Funding Model

 

    Performance BELOW Plan as %
of AOP
  2010 AOP   Performance ABOVE Plan as % of 2009 AOP  
    49%   50%   75%   90%     125%     150%     200%     250%     300%  
Pre Tax/Pre Bonus Net Income Plan   649,544   662,800   994,201   1,193,041   1,325,601   1,657,001      1,988,401      2,651,201      3,314,002      3,976,802   
Total Bonus Pool (wo/tax)   0   126,300   189,451   227,341   252,601   331,400      397,680      530,240      662,800      795,360   
Pre Tax Net Income (AOP)   649,544   536,500   804,750   965,700   1,073,000   1,325,601      1,590,721      2,120,961      2,651,201      3,181,442   
    MIN                 MAX   
          100% AIP Target          
          252,601          
  Management Split at 50-100% of AOP   19.06%          
  Management Split Over 100% of AOP     20.00   20.00   20.00   20.00   20.00

 

   

Actual Bonus Pool Amount will be interpolated for performance between 50% to 300% of 2010 AOP Pre-Tax Net Income.

 

   

The 2010 target is not adjusted for the impact of a potential stock conversion or name change expenses, nor does it include other unbudgeted projects such as compensation consulting.

 

June 16, 2010    Confidential    3


2010 Participation

 

Name

   Participation Level

Weaver

   30%

Sanders

   25%

Rowland

   20%

Salls

   25%

New Comm LO

   20%

Stephens

   10%

Rankin

   15%

Erickson

   10%

Campos

   10%

Reynolds

   10%

Dine

   10%

Mayo

   10%

 

June 16, 2010    Confidential    4


Detail

 

    

EMPLOYEE NAME Salary

   Current
Award
   Formula
Target
100%
    Payout @

   Weaver    246,500    30   $ 73,950

   Sanders    151,710    25   $ 37,928

   Rowland    144,135    20   $ 28,827

   Salls    139,192    25   $ 34,798

   New CLO    100,000    20   $ 20,000

   Stephens    73,868    10   $ 7,387

   Rankin    97,136    15   $ 14,570

   Campos    82,400    10   $ 8,240

   Reynolds    73,001    10   $ 7,300

   Dine    82,400    10   $ 8,240

   Mayo    45,629    10   $ 4,563

   Erickson    67,980    10   $ 6,798

   Sub Tot    896,584      $ 252,601

   Tax @ 7.65%         $ 19,324

   Total         $ 271,925


2010

AIP General Terms and Conditions

 

 

The 2010 AIP Plan (the “Plan”) was designed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (BOD), and will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Executive Committee of the BOD will provide CEO and Officer performance appraisal input to the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) as part of the annual performance review process.

 

 

Participation in the 2010 AIP requires being in an eligible AIP position and being an employee in good standing at the conclusion of the performance period, which will be December 31, 2010.

 

 

The Committee will have the full authority to select employees who will participate in the Plan; determine the final awards; determine the terms and conditions of award opportunities in a manner consistent with the Plan and interpret the plan as needed.

 

 

Once established, performance goals normally will not be changed during the performance period. However, if the Committee determines that external changes or other unanticipated business conditions have materially affected the basis upon which the goals were set, then the Committee may approve appropriate adjustments to the performance goals (either up or down) during the performance period as such goals apply to the award opportunities of participants.

 

 

In addition, the Compensation Committee will have the authority to reduce, increase or eliminate the final award determinations, based upon any objective or subjective criteria it deems appropriate including but not limited to profitability, CAMEL ratings, asset quality ratios, peer group comparisons, or other financial or non-financial measures.

 

June 16, 2010    Confidential    6