FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON 2010 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN Revised - December 2010
Exhibit 4.1
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON
2010 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
Revised - December 2010
Purpose:
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (Bank) has established a 2010 Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) which is designed to reward and retain corporate officers during turbulent economic conditions and an atypical period of financial performance challenges as evidenced by the lack of dividend payments to members, suspension of the repurchase of excess capital stock and lack of funding for the AHP program. Payout opportunities for 2010 EIP participants are generally based on the Banks current financial situation, not the competitive market. It is intended that in subsequent EIP performance periods opportunities will increase to competitive levels as the Banks financial performance improves, e.g. from 50% of recommended payouts to 75% when the Bank resumes meaningful dividend payments and to 100% when the Bank resumes repurchase of excess stock.
Guiding Principles:
The 2010 EIP is intended to:
· Recognize that the Banks current overall focus is a return to earnings generation to a level that allows payment of dividends, resumption of the purchase of excess capital stock, and funding of the AHP program.
· Reinforce and reward the Banks commitment to conservative, prudent, sound risk management practices and preservation of the par value of the Banks capital stock.
· Reflect a reasonable assessment of the Banks financial situation and prospects while rewarding achievement of identified remediation milestones and the Banks financial plan and strategic objectives as spelled out in the Banks 2010 Business Plan.
· Tie a significant percentage of incentive awards to the long-term financial condition and performance of the Bank.
· Recognize the importance of individual performance through metrics linked to the Banks strategic goals and/or objectives of the participants principal functions.
· Recognize that continued enhancements and upkeep of the Banks operational infrastructure are critical to the Banks long-term condition.
Incentive Goals:
The incentive goals for all participants, with the exception of those participants in Enterprise Risk Management, are summarized in the following table with more detail following in Appendix A:
Goal | Weight | Threshold | Target | Excess | ||
| Pres. | Tier I | Tiers II & III |
|
|
|
Pre-assessment Core Net Income |
25%
|
20% |
10% |
$212.0 MM |
$249.0 MM |
$286.0 MM |
Member Outreach |
10%
|
10%
|
10%
|
45% of membership
|
60% of membership |
75% of membership |
Advance Restructures
|
0% |
10% |
10% |
125 |
150 |
175 |
Growth in Membership |
0% |
5% |
5% |
4 New Members
|
6 New Members |
8 New Members
|
2010 CDA and ESA Advances Balances
|
10%
|
10%
|
10%
|
$2.5 Billion |
$2.619 Billion |
$2.852 Billion |
Remediation of 2009 Report of Examination Findings |
25%
|
20%
|
20%
|
70% Clearance |
85% Clearance |
100% Clearance |
Individual, Bank-Wide or Department-Specific
|
30% |
25%
|
35% | As documented by supervisor | As documented by supervisor | As documented by supervisor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Incentive goals for Enterprise Risk Management participants in Tiers I, II and III are summarized in the following table with more detail following in Appendix A
Goal | Weight | Threshold | Target | Excess | |
| Tier I | Tiers II & III |
|
|
|
Pre-assessment Core Net Income |
10% |
5% |
$212.0 MM |
$249.0 MM |
$286.0 MM |
Member Outreach |
10%
|
10%
|
45% of membership
|
60% of membership |
75% of membership |
Advance Restructures
|
10% |
10% |
125 |
150 |
175 |
Growth in Membership |
5%
|
5%
| 4 New Members
| 6 New Members | 8 New Members
|
2010 CDA and ESA Advances Balances
|
10%
|
10%
|
$2.5 Billion |
$2.619 Billion |
$2.852 Billion |
Remediation of 2009 Report of Examination Findings | 30%
| 25%
| 70% Clearance | 85% Clearance | 100% Clearance |
Individual, Bank-Wide or Department-Specific
|
25%
|
35% | As documented by supervisor | As documented by supervisor | As documented by supervisor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Incentive Opportunity
Eligible participants will be assigned an incentive award opportunity that combines short and long-term incentives and is expressed as a percentage of the incumbents 2010 actual annual base salary, as illustrated in the chart below.
| Combined Short and Long-Term Incentive
| ||
| Threshold | Target | Excess |
President |
15.00% |
30.00% |
45.00% |
Tier I |
11.00% |
22.00% |
33.0% |
Tier II |
8.75% |
17.50% |
26.25% |
Tier III |
6.25% |
12.50% |
18.75% |
Goal achievement and individual awards for the goals on pages two and three will be calculated at the conclusion of 2010 based on results as of December 31, 2010. Participants will be eligible to receive sixty (60) percent of such award in a cash payment, subject to the final approval of the board and the review of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), if required, on the first pay day in March 2011. Except as otherwise described under EIP Administration, the participant must be employed by the Bank on the date of payment of the award to receive the award. The chart below illustrates the Threshold, Target and Excess payout potentials for this short-term award, by tier.
2010 Short-Term Incentive Opportunity
| |||
Tier | Threshold | Target | Excess |
President | 9.00% | 18.00% | 27.00% |
Tier I | 6.60% | 13.20% | 19.80% |
Tier II | 5.25% | 10.50% | 15.75% |
Tier III* | 6.25% | 12.50% | 18.75% |
*100% of payout opportunity to be paid following year-end 2010; no long-term opportunity
Participants will be eligible to receive the long-term award opportunity as cash on the first pay day in March 2013, as follows:
Long-Term Goal: | Retained Earnings as of December 31, 20121: |
Threshold: | $405.0 million |
Target: | $475.0 million |
Excess: | $545.0 million |
1 The December 31, 2012 Retained Earnings goal is as projected in the Banks 2011 Strategic Business Plan.
4
Long-Term Incentive Opportunity Payable after Year-End 2012:
Threshold: |
| An award equal to fifty (50) percent of the remaining forty (40) percent of the combined award opportunity |
Target: |
| An award equal to the remaining forty (40) percent of the combined award opportunity |
Excess: |
| An award equal to 150 percent of the remaining forty (40) percent of the combined award opportunity |
In addition, the following conditions must be satisfied for participants to receive the long-term award opportunity:
· The participant is in employment with the Bank on the payment date, as described below in EIP Administration, and
· Subject to the final approval of the board and review of the FHFA, if required.
Eligible Participants
The following individuals are participants in the EIP for 2010:
President |
|
| Tier I |
|
| Tier II |
|
| Tier III |
Edward A. Hjerpe, III |
|
| Janelle K. Authur |
|
| Brian G. Donahue |
|
| Bryan Gulachenski |
|
|
| Earl W. Baucom |
|
| John F. Henderson, Jr.* |
|
| Paul T. Pouliot |
|
|
| George H. Collins* |
|
| Kelly A. LaCava |
|
| Allison Santoro |
|
|
| M. Susan Elliott |
|
| Rachele McDonough |
|
| Edward A. Schultze* |
|
|
| Frank Nitkiewicz |
|
| Paul Peduto |
|
| Kenneth A. Willis |
|
|
| Carol H. Pratt |
|
| Kevin Whittaker* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thomas C. Wolf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Denotes participant in Enterprise Risk Management Department
EIP Administration
The EIP is administered by the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors (Committee), which shall have full power and binding authority to construe, interpret, and administer the EIP, and to adjust it for extraordinary circumstances. Extraordinary circumstances may include changes in business strategy, termination or commencement of business lines, impact of severe economic fluctuations, significant growth or consolidation of the membership base, or significant regulatory or other changes impacting the Bank or Bank System.
The Committee reserves the right at any time to amend, suspend or terminate the EIP in whole or in part, for any reason, and without the consent of any EIP participant.
The Banks President and Chief Executive Officer will determine participation in the EIP with the concurrence of the Committee.
5
EIP awards shall not be considered earned or payable, in whole or in part, to any participant for any reason until they are finally determined by the Banks President and Chief Executive Officer with the concurrence of the Committee following the end of the plan years.
Any individual hired or promoted into an eligible position during 2010 that is granted an award shall have any such incentive award prorated based on months of EIP participation, providing he/she has served a minimum of six months in that role in 2010 and otherwise satisfies the EIPs requirements.
Except as described below, any EIP participant who terminates employment for any reason, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, before the applicable award payment date will not be entitled to any award, except as otherwise determined by the Banks President and Chief Executive Officer, with the concurrence of the Committee, at their sole discretion and subject to review of the FHFA, if required2.
· EIP participants who terminate employment with the Bank by reason of death or disability or who are eligible to retire3 from employment with the Bank prior to the March 2011 short-term award payment date may receive a pro rata payment of the sixty (60) percent short-term incentive opportunity as determined and recommended by the Banks President and Chief Executive Officer, with the concurrence of the Committee and at their sole discretion and subject to the review of the FHFA, if required, based on the months of completed service as an EIP participant during 2010. To be eligible, the participant must complete at least six months of se rvice in 2010 and otherwise satisfy the EIPs requirements. Participants who die, become disabled, or retire during 2010 will not be eligible for any long-term incentive award.
· EIP participants who terminate employment with the Bank by reason of death or disability prior to the long-term award payment date in March 2013, or who terminate prior to the long-term award payment date and are eligible to retire from employment with the Bank, may become eligible to receive a pro rata payment of the forty (40) percent long-term incentive opportunity based on the number of months of completed service as an EIP participant during the two year period following the plan year, subject to the granting of awards based on 2012 year-end results described above, the recommendation of the Banks President and Chief Executive Officer, with the concurrence of the Committee and at their sole discretion, and subject to review of the FHFA, if required.
Awards to retiring or disabled participants or beneficiaries will be paid at the same time as awards to all active participants. Beneficiaries of such payments will be the same as identified in the Banks group insurance plan.
2 Where the EIP refers to the participants termination of employment for purposes of receiving any payment, whether such a termination has occurred will be determined in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations thereunder.
3 Eligibility to retire is defined as employees who are i) eligible for normal retirement as defined in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions or ii) meet the Rule of 70 as defined in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions, including credited service in the FHLB system, but excluding any other credited service at another Pentegra participating employer.
6
The Bank may make such provisions, as it deems appropriate, for withholding payroll taxes in connection with payment of EIP awards.
The Bank also has several other incentive programs for staff at the Bank designed to motivate employees to become more innovative and productive. The Banks President and Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the administration of each of these programs and has the authority to construe, implement, and administer programs, as appropriate.
7
Appendix A Goal Definitions
Profitability Goal
Pre-assessment Core Net Income =
Net Income (Prepayment Fees Historical Prepayment Fee Amortization)
+ (Debt Retirement Costs Historical Debt Retirement Cost Amortization)
Net Fair Value Adjustments + OTTI Credit Losses + REFCorp Expense + AHP Expense
Net Income = 2010 net income reported in accordance with GAAP in the United States.
Historical Prepayment Fee Amortization = the current-period, straight-line amortization of all historical prepayment fees (whether recognized at time of prepayment or as a yield adjustment on a modified loan) over the original remaining lives of the prepaid assets.
Historical Debt Retirement Cost Amortization = the current-period, straight-line amortization of all historical debt retirement costs over the original remaining lives of the retired liabilities.
Net Fair Value Adjustments = the net unrealized gains and losses as recognized under GAAP attributable to hedges, whether economic hedges or SFAS 133-qualifying hedges, plus trading securities gains and losses.
OTTI Credit Losses = the absolute value of the full-year amount of the credit loss portion of overall losses attributable to other-than-temporary impairments of securities.
In the event that the Bank is required to adjust current period net income to correct prior period accounting errors, positive adjustments to net income resulting from the correction of prior period accounting errors are to be excluded from Pre-assessment Core Net Income, while negative adjustments are to be retained in Pre-assessment Core Net Income.
The exclusion of prepayment fee income and associated debt retirement and swap unwind expense from the Pre-assessment Core Net Income metric removes the potential for windfall compensation in the event of heavy prepayment fee income and removes a potential disincentive to prudently respond to prepayment events by excluding the otherwise punitive cost of debt retirement and swap unwind expense. The exclusion of net unrealized fair value adjustments is consistent with the way that management projects its financial performance and reflects the fact that these adjustments are merely timing adjustments to net income that have no net impact to the Banks net income if gains or losses are never realized. OTTI Credit Losses are excluded from Pre-assessment Core Net Income because they cannot be controlled by management.
Member Outreach Goal
EIP participants, individually or as groups, will meet during the year with representatives from member institutions to develop Bank/member relationships and create new business opportunities. These meetings can range from one-on-one meetings to large group meetings.
8
Advance Restructures Goal
To address member need to extend liabilities without increasing funding liabilities, the Bank introduced in late 2009 the Advance Restructuring solution, which allows members to extend the maturities of their current advances without booking prepayment fees in the current period. This goal will be measured by the number of individual advances restructured during 2010 through the Banks Advances Restructuring product or as part of a member-directed restructure which does not blend the prepayment fee into the new advance interest rate.
Mission-Related Advances Goal
The focus of the mission-related metric will be to expand member lending activities in the communities they serve through the Banks Community Development Advances (CDA) and Economic Stimulus Advance (ESA). 1
Remediation of 2009 Report of Examination Findings Goal
To achieve the required improvement in the 2010 FHFA Examination, the exam goal requires that management work towards clearance of the 2009 Examination findings that identified weaknesses. We have targeted the 2009 weakness findings, and have established awards of 70% clearance for a threshold award, 85% clearance for a target award, and 100% clearance for an excess award. While management has put in place remediation plans and in many cases has already implemented the plans, this component of the EIP recognizes both the need to ensure ongoing improvement and the need to address not only the specifics of the 2009 findings, but also the broad-based intent on the part of the finding. For the purposes of this goal, the term clearance is defined as a 2009 finding not being repeated as a weakness in the 2010 examination.
Individual, Bank-wide or Department-Specific Goal
EIP participants are responsible for supporting significant Bank-wide strategic goals or department-specific initiatives and projects that contribute to the success of the bank. The Individual, Bank-wide or Department-Specific Goal provides for recognition of the participants successful contributions toward achievement of Bank-wide strategic goals or completion of department-specific initiatives.
Payments awarded under the Individual, Bank-wide or Department-Specific Goal will take into consideration the participants achievement of one to three individual goals that support the Banks strategic goals or department-specific initiatives, established at the beginning of the plan year. The goals or initiatives may be non-financial, operational objectives or may add additional weight to a profitability or growth goal. Revisions to these goals or initiatives may be considered on a case-by-case basis during the year but must be approved, in writing, by the President and Chief Executive Officer.
Payments under the Individual, Bank-wide or Department-Specific Goal will be based on the individuals combined, overall performance on the one to three individual goals or initiatives, as evaluated by the participants manager. The goals or initiatives may be shared within a department or across multiple departments, but the managers assessment will be based on the participants individual contribution as well as the overall achievement of the initiative. Managers may select a payout percentage for individual, Bank-wide or department-specific objectives from a range of threshold to a maximum payout at excess to recognize the degree to
9
which the EIP participant accomplished these results. If the individual goals supporting Bank-wide strategic goals or department-specific initiative(s) are not substantially achieved, the manager may award zero for this goal. Managers need to provide reasonable documentation as the basis for any award recommended under this goal.
1This goal is measured using the following advance product types: 868, 877, 878, 879, 903, 904, 905, 910, 913, 914 and 915 and any new housing and community development product codes introdued during the Plan year.
10